OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [xliff] XLIFF TC Call - Summary - Nov-15-2016


> Am 15.11.2016 um 17:06 schrieb Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>:
> 
> Summary of the XLIFF TC Call Nov-15-2016
> ========================================
> 
> - Present: David, Bryan, Yves, Soroush, Tom, Lucia
> - Regrets: Phil, (Felix probably in Dublin too)

Indeed :)

> 
> 
>  B. Approve meeting minutes, 1 November 2016
>     https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201611/msg00016.html
> 
> BS: move to accept those as the minutes for last call
> YS: second
> No dissent.
> 
> BS: One of the XLF2.1 issues difficult to resolve is #9 (ITS vs ITSM namespace)
> BS has issue with audio.
> 
> 
> --- Issue #9: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-9
> 
> YS: it seems that if we don't use ITS namespace we can't have them as ITS data categories
> .. We can't access them with ITS processors
> 
> DF: there are other obstacles with ITS processors, like sm/em too.
> 
> YS: I think sm is pretty much the only obstacle if you have ITS pointers
> 
> DF: Felix mentioned the fact we could use the ITS schemas

Yes, and there are schemas used in DocBook and these are normative part of DocBook 5.1, AFAIK.

> .. for example docbook 5.1, not sure about DITA

I am not aware of ITS schemas for DITA.

Best,

Felix

> SS: That is correct (DocBook+ITS)
> DF: so if we can change the catalog and point to our schema
> .. then we could do the ITS validation
> 
> TC: I'm not aware of any different schema for ITS in DITA
> 
> DF: we should confirm with Felix
> .. We should move to something else.
> 
> 
> DF: Issue 8 is depending on issue 9.
> 
> SS: DocBook doesn't use the ITS native namespace.
> DF: also for data categories without pointers?
> SS: Not sure, will have to check
> 
> 
> --- Issue-4: CTR: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-4
> 
> DF: think we should track only separate items
> .. not able to track several things in one item
> .. maybe we can have content and some other coordinated attributes
> .. Will work on a possible solution: change data model and PRs.
> .. and Soroush will update the Schematron
> 
> 
> --- Issue-5: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-5
> 
> Depending on #9 too.
> 
> DF: we should be able to change the list of what is making up the XLIFF-defined elements/attributes
> YS: It seems that would be a core change: some core PR depend on the definition of what is a XLIFF-defined construct
> .. so if we change that definition, we change the core, no?
> DF: I think we should be able to change the definitions, it's not part of the core.
> 
> 
> --- Issue-10: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-10
> 
> Good catch.
> Error in the schema it seems.
> Soroush to change the schema.
> No dissent.
> 
> 
> BS: will have a hard stop at 9AM PT
> 
> -end
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]