Subject: Re: [xliff-comment] csprd02- Comments in the draft
There are quite a few (more than a dozen) embedded comments in this latest draft:
e.g: "COMMENT: MAKE CLEAR THAT THERE ARE TWO HANDLINGS, ONE IS NOT TO REPRESENT THE DATA CATEGORY, THE OTHER IS IN THE MODULE. THE
EXTRACTION IS FOR ITS PROCESSORS GENERATING XLIFF, THE DIRECT REPRESENTATION IS FOR XLIFF PROCESSORS."
Some, like the one above, seem to indicate that there are still relatively important parts of the text that needs to be
I assume this means there will be a csprd03 regardless of the disposition of the comments for csprd02. Is that correct?
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
List help: xliff-comment-help@lists.
List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/
Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/
Join OASIS: http://www.oasis-open.org/