[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-28) Comments in the draft
David Filip created XLIFF-28: -------------------------------- Summary: Comments in the draft Key: XLIFF-28 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-28 Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC Issue Type: Bug Components: ITS Module Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd02 Environment: http://markmail.org/thread/jzdqfm5c6hgofjbu Reporter: Yves Savourel Assignee: David Filip Priority: Minor Fix For: 2.1_cs01 There are quite a few (more than a dozen) embedded comments in this latest draft: e.g: "COMMENT: MAKE CLEAR THAT THERE ARE TWO HANDLINGS, ONE IS NOT TO REPRESENT THE DATA CATEGORY, THE OTHER IS IN THE MODULE. THE EXTRACTION IS FOR ITS PROCESSORS GENERATING XLIFF, THE DIRECT REPRESENTATION IS FOR XLIFF PROCESSORS." Some, like the one above, seem to indicate that there are still relatively important parts of the text that needs to be edited/added/etc. I assume this means there will be a csprd03 regardless of the disposition of the comments for csprd02. Is that correct? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]