[OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-28) Comments in the draft

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-28?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=65395#comment-65395 ] 

David Filip commented on XLIFF-28:
----------------------------------

Found another VERSAL comments that requires work on an Example in the section Elements within Text

COMMENT: NEED TO REFINE THE EXAMPLE E.G. WITH
      AN IMAGE WHICH HAS THEN A TITLE AND AN ALT ATTRIBUTE; IMAGE WOULD NOT BE FROM HTML SINCE
      ATTRIBUTES ARE NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN ELEMENTS WITHIN TEXT; MAYBE USE DITA OR DOCBOOK
      "FIGURE" ELEMENTS?

Assigning to Felix again

> Comments in the draft
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: XLIFF-28
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-28
>             Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ITS Module
>    Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd02
>         Environment: http://markmail.org/thread/jzdqfm5c6hgofjbu
>            Reporter: Yves Savourel
>            Assignee: Felix Sasaki
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: Proposed, editorial, work_required
>             Fix For: 2.1_csprd03
>
>
> There are quite a few (more than a dozen) embedded comments in this latest
> draft:
> e.g: "COMMENT: MAKE CLEAR THAT THERE ARE TWO HANDLINGS, ONE IS NOT TO REPRESENT
> THE DATA CATEGORY, THE OTHER IS IN THE MODULE. THE
> EXTRACTION IS FOR ITS PROCESSORS GENERATING XLIFF, THE DIRECT REPRESENTATION IS
> FOR XLIFF PROCESSORS."
> Some, like the one above, seem to indicate that there are still relatively
> important parts of the text that needs to be
> edited/added/etc.
> I assume this means there will be a csprd03 regardless of the disposition of the
> comments for csprd02. Is that correct?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)