Dear all,
As discussed in the last TC meeting, I have just applied the changes related to the new draft in the survey.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
Please let me know if you have any further feedback on it.
Thanks and have a nice weekend,
Lucía
De : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org]
De la part de Lucia Morado Vazquez
Envoyé : lundi, 27 février 2017 18:24
À : David Filip <david.filip@adaptcentre.ie>
Cc : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Objet : RE: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update
Dear David,
Thank you for your message. I have just changed the settings of the survey . The survey can be taken more than once from
the same device.
Best,
Lucía
De : David Filip [mailto:david.filip@adaptcentre.ie]
Envoyé : lundi 27 février 2017 10:08
À : Lucia Morado Vazquez <Lucia.Morado@unige.ch>
Cc : xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update
Hi Lucía,
it doesn't let me retake the survey.. strange not sure how it even knows?
Dr. David Filip
OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair
OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer
KDEG, Trinity College Dublin
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez <Lucia.Morado@unige.ch> wrote:
Dear David, all,
Thank you very much for your feedback. I have implemented your suggestions.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
In the ITS section, we have now cases where there is only one attribute to be selected.
The normal formulation for introducing that question implied several possible answers ("Please select from the following attributes the ones that your tool can process:"). Should we leave it like this for consistency or should I change the formulation of the
question? (e.g. Can your tool process the X attribute?)
One of David’s suggestions is still not modified:
>>Q15 should use another example, as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension
>>@Bryan, @Yves do you want to name your extended namespace examples?
Please let me know if you have any more feedback.
Best,
Lucía
De :
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org]
De la part de David Filip
Envoyé : mardi 21 février 2017 19:02
À : Lucia Morado Vazquez <Lucia.Morado@unige.ch>;
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Objet : Re: [xliff] XLIFF SOU Questionnaire Draft: Update
Hi all,
continued feedback to the questionnaire
Change Tracking Module 2.1 [Change Tracking Module 2.0 was deprecated]
shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)
But id, type, and translate are all from core (xlf) so shouldn't be re-asked here.
The only new attribute specific for the ITS Tools Annotation is its:annotatorsRef
So in the end it should be just one checkbox for that attribute
Should have just one checkbox for its:allowedCharacters
Should have just one checkbox for itsm:domains
shouldn't use radio buttons as multiple selections desirable, should use checkbox(es)
Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core
Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core
Again should have just checkboxes for the its: attributes and not for core
Q71-Q73 should be removed
Can your tool roundtrip ITS Localization Note data using XLIFF Core Note and XLIFF Core Comment
Annotation
Does your tool support the Terminology data category?
should be
Does your tool FULLY support the Terminology data category?
There should be checkboxes just for the its: attributes
+ there also needs to be a checkox for
[not just for the core type unspecified]
Checkboxes just for the its: attributes
Checkboxes just for the its: attributes
This is now my complete feedback
When all fixed, the SOU questionnaire will be ready to
launch
Dr. David Filip
OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair
OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer
KDEG, Trinity College Dublin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:01 PM, David Filip <david.filip@adaptcentre.ie> wrote:
Lucía, all,
finally finding some time to review this
should be changed to cs01 links
The latest link should be
3. Are
you an OASIS member?
3. Are
you an OASIS member or an employee of an OASIS member organization?
I
am an Individual member or an associated member
Chet clarified that asscociated
members are not considered pripreps. For both Individual and Associated members it is sufficient to receive the statement from them individually
11. Contact
Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers, not for publication)
11. Contact
Email (to be used only to obtain clarification about your answers IF NECESSARY, not for publication)
Q15 should use another example,
as sdlxliff is an XLIFF 1.2 extension
@Bryan, @Yves do you want to name
your extended namespace examples?
More comments will follow tomorrow
Dr. David Filip
OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair
OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer
KDEG, Trinity College Dublin
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Lucia Morado Vazquez <Lucia.Morado@unige.ch> wrote:
Dear all,
Following the suggestions given during yesterday’s meeting, I have included the questions on the ITS module to the SOU questionnaire:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
Please let me know if you have any further suggestions/feedback on the questionnaire.
Best,
Lucia
Dear all,
Here is the link to the new questionnaire (draft) to collect the SOU of the new version.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/souxliff21
I have modified the one we used for 2.0 to adapt it to the new spec.
On the first page, there are two elements in red that need to be updated.
For the ITS module, I could not think of an effective and simple way of adding additional questions to gather more information than the general support of the
module, if you can think of any method to do it (without overcomplicating the questionnaire) please let me know.
Let me know if you have any suggestion/remark on the questionnaire itself.
Best,
Lucía
|