OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-8) mtc:matchQuality cannot be interpreted as ITS MT confidence by ITS processors

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=66219#comment-66219 ] 

David Filip commented on XLIFF-8:

In the meeting 16th May 2017, we agreed that there are three possible solutions
1) keep looking for annotatorsRef to see which category is represented
2) reserve mtc:matchQuality for its:mtConfidence and represent rating score with the W3C namespace
3) use W3C namespace for both, encourage implementers to use the same score for its:mtConfidence and mtc:matchQuality

We also noted that this issue doesn't exist in core where both categories use the W3C ITS namespace.

Yves to get Felixe's opinion on whether 2 or 3 is better. TC fine with either.

> mtc:matchQuality cannot be interpreted as ITS MT confidence by ITS processors 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: XLIFF-8
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-8
>             Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: ITS Module
>    Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd01
>         Environment: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/201610/msg00019.html
>            Reporter: Yves Savourel
>            Assignee: Yves Savourel
>              Labels: material, request_tc_discussion, work_required
>             Fix For: 2.1_csprd02, 2.1_csprd04
> I'm not sure how we can say that MT Confidence is supported in XLIFF:
> The ITS specification does not have global pointer for that data category in ITS.
> Isn't this a case similar to Localization Note where we can easily transfer the data into XLIFF, but technically, a ITS processor
> cannot get the same result?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]