OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-67) LQI comment vs Localization Note

Bryan Schnabel created XLIFF-67:

             Summary: LQI comment vs Localization Note
                 Key: XLIFF-67
                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-67
             Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: other
    Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd04
         Environment: http://markmail.org/message/37xmhk3zbon3i7w3?q=csprd04+list:org%2Eoasis-open%2Elists%2Exliff-comment+order:date-backward
            Reporter: Bryan Schnabel
            Assignee: Yves Savourel
             Fix For: 2.1_cs01

In " Localization Quality Issue" there is a note saying:

"If human reviewers or other QA agents (Enriching Agents from the XLIFF
specification point of view), need to insert general
comments pertaining to whole structural elements such as paragraphs, sections,
or files rather than to specific inline portions of
source or target content, the Localization Note data category is more suitable."

I'm not sure this is wise. I would expect a QA agent to use the LQI data
category, not the Localization Note data category.

Maybe we should say nothing instead of hinting at other ways to do thing?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]