OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xliff message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-65) Change Tracking Module/Extension


     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

David Filip updated XLIFF-65:
-----------------------------

    Environment: http://markmail.org/thread/v726jty4uancxepi  (was: http://markmail.org/message/v726jty4uancxepi)

> Change Tracking Module/Extension
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XLIFF-65
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-65
>             Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ITS Module
>    Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd04
>         Environment: http://markmail.org/thread/v726jty4uancxepi
>            Reporter: Yves Savourel
>            Assignee: David Filip
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: editorial, request_tc_discussion, work_required
>             Fix For: 2.1_cs01
>
>
> A few notes:
> In section "5.9.5 ITS Tools Referencing", in the warning, we point to "5.6
> Change Tracking Extension (Informative)", but the text in
> the referring text says "Change Tracking Module".
> Also the warning includes the text ".possibly extended with ITS Module
> Provenance metadata." But there is no reference to Provenance
> in CTR, including in the schema. 
> Also, the section "5 The Modules Specifications" has now an informative "5.6
> Change Tracking Extension (Informative)" section. It
> look strange to have an extension defined in the specification. Should it be in
> an appendix?
> And finally the top paragraph of the section "5.6 Change Tracking Extension
> (Informative)" says ".replace it with a revised Change
> Tracking Module hopefully for XLIFF Version 2.2."
> I think we should drop "hopefully for XLIFF Version 2.2." as no expectations
> should be set.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.2#6258)


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]