[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xliff-comment] XLIFF 2.1 spec: bad links
Probably not a big deal, just confusing...(#em, #type and so)
There are two different pages that I can find for the XLIFF 2.1 spec:
A newer document here: http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff- core-v2.1.html
It is marked "12 October 2017" and the sub-title is "Candidate OASIS Standard 01"
And an older one t http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cs01/ xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.html
Marked "23 August 2017" and the subtitle is "Committee Specification 01"
Looking at the newest one (xliff-core-v2.1.html) some of the links are wrong
(they point to older doc, instead of staying in the same doc)
For instance go to <source> (http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/xliff- )core-v2.1.html#source
and click on any of the possible content tags.
<sm> goes to http://docs.oasis-open.org/xliff/xliff-core/v2.1/cos01/ and so on.xliff-core-v2.1-cos01.html#sm
v2.1/xliff-core-v2.1.html#sm, click on any attribute (e.g. type), it goes to
/v2.1/cos01/xliff-core-v2.1-cos01.html#type
I might be some bad redirect though, because saving the file the href(s) point to local labels
Thank you,
Mihai
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]