[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Comments from Jerome Jump
These don't sound like changes requiring a new draft, but
if we do have a new draft, they should get integrated.
-Gabe From: Jerome Jump [mailto:Jerome.Jump@epok.net] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:51 AM To: Wachob, Gabe Cc: Chetan Sabnis; Dave McAlpin Subject: XRI Resolution V2.0 Gabe, In
reviewing Committee Draft 01, 14 March 2005 of the Extensible Resource
Identifier (XRI) Resolution V2.0, I came across the
following: 1)
On line 864: I believe the
constructed XRI should be “xri://@example2…” instead of “xri://=example2…”.
This is because the external synonym (line 859) contains an “@”, not an
“=”. Or, change line 859 so that it says “xri://=example2”. In any
case, the two should be consistent. 2)
A lot of the XML, while correct,
should be reformatted for easier reading by a
human. Other than
that, the specs look pretty good. - Epok,
Inc |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]