[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xri-editors] RE: Trusted resolution
Sorry, behind on email due to liberty meeting in helsinki :-( I generally agree with this statement, but wanted to probe a bit un the access control and confidentiallity part. while i agree we should not presribe an explicit normative spec for these, i think we may want to publish a non-normative advisory on potiential risks and likely PEP, PDP, PIP points in the resolution stack. thoughts? --- peterd Dave McAlpin wrote: >I still haven't gotten the ok to distribute the trusted resolution proposal, >but I also had an action item to provide alternative text for section 4.9 of >the requirements doc. How's this? > >The XRI specification must ensure that the specified resolution mechanism(s) >can be extended to provide trusted resolution. Trusted resolution in this >context means the relying party (i.e. the party requesting resolution) can >trust that the result of resolution is correct as defined by the resource's >controlling identifier authority. Specification of the actual mechanism for >trusted resolution may be out of scope for this effort. Data confidentiality >and access control are explicitly outside the scope of this requirement. > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: xri-editors-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org >For additional commands, e-mail: xri-editors-help@lists.oasis-open.org > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]