[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri-editors] Interpretation of "relative XRIs"
I'd
really like the 2396 interpretation to be the case. I just wanted to make
sure.
So the
* gcs really is the "use default naming authority" and the relative xri form is
really the 2396 meaning, which I interpret (like you) to basically mean that to
get a "non-relative" xri from a relative XRI, you syntactically append something
before the relative XRI. Where that "something" comes from is defined generally
in 2396 (but ends up depending on how you got the relative XRI in the first
place).
Great,
fine. Just needed clarification and amplification. I want this specifically said
in the spec!
-Gabe
P.S.
Why would "xri:@foo" + "bar" make "xri:@foo/bar" ? Why not "xri:@foo.bar"? Is
the insertion of the "/" specified in 2396?
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]