OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xri-editors message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [xri-editors] Feedback on rc1d


Good, I wanted to rephrase that sentence anyway. Right now we have "Even though these rules are RECOMMENDED and not REQUIRED, an implementation that fails to observe them may experience an unacceptably high number of false negatives."

 

I'd like to change it to "To reduce the requirements on a minimally conforming processor, the majority of these rules are RECOMMENDED rather than REQUIRED. An implementation that fails to observe them, however, may frequently treat two XRIs as nonequal when in fact they are equal."

 

Does that sound ok?

 

Dave

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Wachob, Gabe [mailto:gwachob@visa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:41 AM
To: 'xri-editors@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: [xri-editors] Feedback on rc1d

 

dsr21: "may experience an unacceptably high numberof false negatives" - its not clear what "false negatives" means in this context. I would say "may frequently treat two XRIs as nonequal when if fact they are equal."

 

section 2.2.4.2 has a cross reference to section 0 - clearly this is wrong.

 

Nothing else jumps out at me - though I've focused mostly on changes. Reviewing old unchanged text tends to be less effective because of my familiarity with it. Things always slip by - time for more eyes!!!

 

    -Gabe

 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]