[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xri] Glossary harmonization
a few IETF wg's come to mind as well: - SIP wg - ENUM ?? - namedroppers (esp in relation to RFC 3401-5 ... DDDS --- peterd Lindelsee, Mike wrote: > Marc, > > > > My list (with the caveat that there are many other efforts that we > could consider) would be: > > > > 1. SAML > > 2. Topic Maps > > 3. W3C Architecture > > 4. Web Services > > 5. Semantic Web > > 6. Directory efforts (such as LDAP, UDDI, DSML, etc.) > > 7. PKI (for terminology related to trust, etc.) > > > > Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* Marc LeMaitre [mailto:Marc.LeMaitre@onename.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:51 PM > *To:* xri@lists.oasis-open.org > *Subject:* [xri] Glossary harmonization > > Hi all, > > > > During last week's face to face meetings I agreed to complete a > piece of work to compare and contrast the XRI TC glossary with > those of other related technologies, standards and protocols. > > > > I would like your feedback in the form a simple prioritized list > as to which you consider to be the most important for me to > consider. My goal is to provide an extension of our normative > glossary in the form of an informative glossary which details how > the XRI TC use of words and phrases compares to the same words, > phrases and concepts in other bodies of work. This should > ultimately make it easier for anyone reading our output to quickly > gain and appreciation for our approach to the problem space. > > > > I hope to have this work in initial draft form for distribution to > this list on Monday of next week (in time to get feedback on our > next conference call) so I would really appreciate a rapid response. > > > > Thanks > > > > Marc > > 703 926 1596 >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC