RE: [xri] RE: Single delegation character

[Peter C Davis <peter.davis@neustar.biz>]

ditto.  it is, among other things, much easier to read.

--- peterd

On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 17:56, Lindelsee, Mike wrote:
> I also prefer the latter for the same reasons that Dave and Loren do.
> 
> Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave McAlpin [mailto:Dave.McAlpin@epok.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 2:26 PM
> To: Loren West; xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xri] RE: Single delegation character
> 
> 
> Good point. Now that we've beaten the delegation issue to death, we can
> come back to the original question about whether we should define one or
> two second level delimiters.
> 
> The question is whether we prefer
> 
> xri:@:3*:4*:5/*:6*:7
> 
> or
> 
> xri:@:3:4:5/:6:7
> 
> for reasons already stated. My preference is the second, i.e. to define
> two second level separators, star ("*") and colon (":").
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri/members/leave_workgroup.php.