[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xri] Issue 1: Clarifying * Semantics
Loren - Note that :12:34 would still be a legal persistent identifier, it just would not imply a separation (or delegation) between two parts. In other words, it is similar to the identifier :12.34 (using the new semantics for dot as a regular character). In my strongly held opinion, if we are going to make any simplifications, they should be aimed at making the semantics easier to understand and the human friendly identifiers simpler and easier to read and (humanly) parse. I believe that is what this proposed simplification does. If it does so at a slight cost to the human readability of non-human (machine) friendly identifiers, that's a good decision. Fen Loren West wrote: > I understand how you see a single separator as a simplification, > and hope you can understand how I see ":" as a simplification > over "*:". They're both "simpler", but one doesn't require > a change to the specification.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]