RE: [xri] RE: [xri-editors] URI authority resolution

["Dave McAlpin" <Dave.McAlpin@epok.net>]

No question, but assertions about individual pieces of the XRID are
independent of the assertion about the XRID itself used by trusted res.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davis, Peter [mailto:peter.davis@neustar.biz]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:48 AM
> To: Wachob, Gabe
> Cc: Drummond Reed; Dave McAlpin; xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xri] RE: [xri-editors] URI authority resolution
> 
> On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 12:42, Wachob, Gabe wrote:
> > <snip/>
> > I don't think a XRID-policing policy can be trusted for ensuring
that
> > the registering party (person who created the XRID) can be trusted.
> 
> Tho i think this leaves room for implimentations to do more than just
> accept the attestation of binding/mapping.  More rigor (policing) by
an
> authority adds value to 'their' part of the tree, potentially.
> 
> --- peterd
>