[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Adding XDI as a service in XRIDs
Actually, no, I don't think that the XRI spec should mention mention other specifications unless they are required by XRI. I would have no problem putting such a mention in the XRI Primer or other supporting documentation though. I do feel very strongly that a specification is for normative material and should be limited to only what needs to be specified. Mike >-----Original Message----- >From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net] >Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 12:03 AM >To: Wachob, Gabe; xri@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [xri] Adding XDI as a service in XRIDs > > >I agree, and never meant to imply, that the XRI specs should have any >dependency on the XDI specs. The dependencies are all the >other way around. > >All I meant was that I think it makes sense for the XRI >specification to >MENTION that another OASIS Technical Committee is defining a >access protocol >specifically for XRI-identified resources called XDI. > >Don't you agree? > >=Drummond
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]