OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xri message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [xri] Comments from Jerome Jump

Are you sure it’s pure errata? I realize it’s easy enough to figure out what was intended, but it looks like a normative change to me.




From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net]
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 5:09 AM
To: 'Wachob, Gabe'; xri@lists.oasis-open.org; xri-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xri] Comments from Jerome Jump


Speaking of erratta, in writing another document that references the Syntax spec, I noticed that we forgot to roll one of the final changes we made to the ABNF in the main doc into the collected ABNF in Appendix A.


It's on line 852/3 it currently says:


xri-gen-delims    = ":" / "/" / "?" / "#" / "[" / "]" / "("
                  / ")" / "*" / gcs-char


It should match lines 223/4:


  xri-gen-delims   = ":" / "/" / "?" / "#" / "[" / "]" / "(" / ")"
                / "*" / "!" / rgcs-char

This is pure erratta, but we need to roll it in too.




From: Wachob, Gabe [mailto:gwachob@visa.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 12:47 PM
To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org; xri-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [xri] Comments from Jerome Jump


These don't sound like changes requiring a new draft, but if we do have a new draft, they should get integrated.




From: Jerome Jump [mailto:Jerome.Jump@epok.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:51 AM
To: Wachob, Gabe
Cc: Chetan Sabnis; Dave McAlpin
Subject: XRI Resolution V2.0


     In reviewing Committee Draft 01, 14 March 2005 of the Extensible Resource Identifier (XRI) Resolution V2.0, I came across the following:


1)       On line 864:  I believe the constructed XRI should be “xri://@example2…” instead of “xri://=example2…”.  This is because the external synonym (line 859) contains an “@”, not an “=”.  Or, change line 859 so that it says “xri://=example2”.  In any case, the two should be consistent.

2)       A lot of the XML, while correct, should be reformatted for easier reading by a human.


     Other than that, the specs look pretty good.


-Jerome M. Jump

Epok, Inc


Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]