[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Comments from Jerome Jump
Are you sure it’s pure errata? I
realize it’s easy enough to figure out what was intended, but it looks
like a normative change to me. Dave From: Drummond Reed
[mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net] Speaking of erratta, in writing another
document that references the Syntax spec, I noticed that we forgot to roll one
of the final changes we made to the ABNF in the main doc into the collected
ABNF in Appendix A. It's on line 852/3 it currently says: xri-gen-delims
= ":" / "/" / "?" / "#" / "["
/ "]" / "(" It should match lines 223/4:
xri-gen-delims = ":" / "/" / "?" /
"#" / "[" / "]" / "(" / ")" This is pure erratta, but we need to roll
it in too. =Drummond From: Wachob, Gabe
[mailto:gwachob@visa.com] These don't sound like changes requiring a
new draft, but if we do have a new draft, they should get integrated. -Gabe From: Jerome
Jump [mailto:Jerome.Jump@epok.net] Gabe, In reviewing Committee Draft 01, 14
March 2005 of the Extensible Resource Identifier (XRI) Resolution V2.0, I came
across the following: 1) On line
864: I believe the constructed XRI should be
“xri://@example2…” instead of
“xri://=example2…”. This is because the external
synonym (line 859) contains an “@”, not an “=”.
Or, change line 859 so that it says “xri://=example2”.
In any case, the two should be consistent. 2) A lot of the
XML, while correct, should be reformatted for easier reading by a human. Other than that, the specs look
pretty good. - Epok, Inc -- |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]