RE: [xri] Metadata I1 - Identifier Type

["Lindelsee, Mike " <mlindels@visa.com>]

Congrats! ;) 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Schleiff, Marty [mailto:marty.schleiff@boeing.com] 
>Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 5:00 PM
>To: Drummond Reed; Dave McAlpin; Lindelsee, Mike ; 
>xri@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [xri] Metadata I1 - Identifier Type
>
>I just heard that I am now a member rather than just a measley
>applicant, and now I should be able to post to the list. I'll find out
>as soon as I send this message. 
>
>
>Marty.Schleiff@boeing.com; CISSP
>Associate Technical Fellow - Cyber Identity Specialist
>Computing Security Infrastructure
>(425) 957-5667
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net] 
>Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 4:53 PM
>To: 'Dave McAlpin'; 'Lindelsee, Mike '; xri@lists.oasis-open.org
>Cc: Schleiff, Marty
>Subject: RE: [xri] Metadata I1 - Identifier Type
>
>Mike,
>
>First, sorry for joining this discussion late - our email servers were
>down all afternoon for some unknown reason.
>
>Anyway, Marty Schlieff from Boeing has officially joined the 
>TC and been
>approved by the Boeing OASIS rep for membership, so he can 
>officially be
>part of these discussions. However he's emailed me that he seems not to
>be able to post to the list yet, so he's having trouble participating.
>
>Since he is the one most familiar with these requirements, the fastest
>thing would probably be to schedule a phone call with Marty. 
>If we can't
>arrange to do it before Friday, then we could make it part of 
>the agenda
>on Friday's call.
>
>Marty, in the meantime if you still have trouble posting, just 
>send your
>emails to Dave or myself and we'll forward them to the list.
>
>=Drummond 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dave McAlpin [mailto:Dave.McAlpin@epok.net]
>Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 3:48 PM
>To: Lindelsee, Mike ; xri@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [xri] Metadata I1 - Identifier Type
>
>The idea is that there should be a standardized, canonical
>representation of various common identifier types - a standard way to
>represent something like an employee number in an XRI, for example. The
>+ namespace isn't sufficient for this because there's no authority to
>give it an official definition.
>
>The request, which came from external parties, is that the TC publish
>these canonical representations to promote interoperability. They've
>volunteered to most of the work on putting these together.
>
>Dave
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lindelsee, Mike [mailto:mlindels@visa.com]
>> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 3:01 PM
>> To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
>> Subject: [xri] Metadata I1 - Identifier Type
>> 
>> I thought I'd start a round of discussion on the various issues.  I 
>> noted that this issue doesn't have a proposal page yet.  I'd request 
>> that we start with a list of requirements instead of jumping straight
>to
>> solutions.  That way we will all be able to understand if a solution
>is
>> sufficient and if those requirements are requirements that 
>the TC as a
>
>> whole feels need to be met (or can be met in other ways).
>> 
>> My initial thought is that identifiers/segments/subsegments 
>can easily
>
>> be identified by using the + namespace.  I don't see any reason that
>new
>> text would need to be added to the spec(s) to support this 
>capability.
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
>> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all 
>your TCs in
>
>> OASIS
>> at:
>> 
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
>OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>
>