[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] XRI Resolution 2.0 Comittee Spec Proposal
Sounds prudent. +1 From: Gabe Wachob
[mailto:gabe.wachob@amsoft.net] A number of us had a conversation at IIW this week about the
progress on XRI specs, and the fact that OpenID 2.0 is, in part, waiting on XRI
specs to become citeable (ie not draft stage). Drummond and I (and several others at the table) agreed that
we should promote XRI Res 2.0 wd 11 (or something soon after) to a committee
spec so that the openid community can reference it. The intent here is to
document what is essentially already being used in the wild, based on our
earlier drafts and with a very few additional proposals that have come up from
experience in the wild. If we don’t approve XRI Res 2.0 as a committee spec, I
am almost certain XRI will be pulled out of OpenID core specifications. I
can’t guarantee that it won’t anyway, but I think it’s really
up to us to put up now and produce a committee spec that can actually be cited.
We have to be disciplined on our goal with this release, and
need to be guided primarily by OpenID adoption concerns. because any
substantive changes to openid implementations (that aren’t driven by
OpenID needs) are going to be rejected by the OpenID community at this point. In addition, there was discussion as well on continuing the
work beyond 2.0, of course. The proposal was made to call this work 3.0 –
something I would endorse. This is a separate topic that can be discussed
later.
-Gabe |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]