RE: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: WD11 Section 8 (Yadis) proposed text

["=nat" <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>]

Drummond, 

Yes. I think we should state that for the sake of completeness. 
Maybe it is just me, but I always tend to think of "Normal Case" and 
"Abnormal Case" and feel very incomplete if one of them is missing. 

Regards, 

Nat 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 8:47 AM
> To: 崎村 夏彦
> Cc: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: WD11 Section 8 (Yadis) proposed text
> 
> Nat,
> 
> The Yadis spec at yadis.org 
> (http://yadis.org/papers/yadis-v1.0.pdf) does not specify any 
> HTTP(S) success or failure codes. The reasons (as I remember
> them) were: a) it's just standard HTTP(S), so all the 
> standard HTTP(S) error codes apply, and b) if the HTTP(S) 
> server you are talking to doesn't know anything about XRDS 
> documents, it's simply going to give you standard HTTP 
> response codes anyway. 
> 
> I suppose we could add a sentence saying that the standard 
> HTTP response codes defined in RFC 2616 apply. Would that help?
> 
> =Drummond 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:n-sakimura@nri.co.jp]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:09 AM
> To: Drummond Reed
> Cc: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: WD11 Section 8 (Yadis) proposed text
> 
> Hi.
> 
> Don't we need to specify the HTTP status code for both 
> success and failure?
> Also, what should be returned for the failure case, 
> especially when HEAD request was used?
> 
> Nat
> 
> On 2007/05/21, at 15:01, Drummond Reed wrote:
> 
> > XRI TC Members and Observers:
> >
> >
> >
> > In keeping with the consensus from last week to make our highest  
> > priority the completion of the XRI Resolution 2.0 spec, we are  
> > plunging into review of Working Draft 11 this week. The ball for  
> > posting the first editor's draft is in my court, and I have  
> > reserved all day Tuesday for completing it so review can begin  
> > Wednesday before our standard TC telecon this coming Thursday.
> >
> >
> >
> > However one section is ready for review immediately - the new  
> > section 8, which is where we are incorporating the Yadis  
> > specification for discovery of XRDS document from an HTTP URI.  
> > Since we need the Yadis and OpenID communities to review this  
> > carefully, I have posted the proposed text of this section 
> as a new  
> > XRI TC wiki page at:
> >
> >
> >
> >             http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriCd02/ 
> > XrdsDiscoveryFromHttpUris
> >
> >
> >
> > I would like to post a request for review to the OpenID  
> > Specification mailing list tomorrow (Monday) night after the XRI  
> > Resolution editors and other TC members have had a chance 
> to review  
> > it. So please do look this over tomorrow if you can - it's only  
> > about 1 page of text - and post any and all feedback to the list  
> > (even if it's just to say +1).
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > =Drummond
> >
> >
> 
>