OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xri message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [xri] Use of the word "synonym" in section 10


Markus,

 

> I know it's more complicated than that: But from my naive point of view two XRI

> identifiers are synonyms if for all possible input parameters they return the same SEP(s).

 

Cool. The important thing here (and it really makes me happy to see it) is that you are establishing a model for what constitutes synonymity and identity.

 

I believe you are saying that if I resolve =steven.churchill with a given set of input parameters and I resolve @ootao*steve with the same set of input parameters, then the two XRIs are synonyms only if the resolver returns the same set of SEPs. If so, then your notion of synonymity is tied to the Resolver input parameters (the XRIs are synonyms with respect to a given set of input parameters) and your notion of identity is tied to sets of identical SEPs. This is a perfectly valid model. (If I misinterpreted your model, I apologize, but it really doesn’t matter. You model may be a bit different than what I described, but it is still a valid model.)

 

Here is another model:

Two XRI identifiers are synonyms with respect to a given set of resolution input parameters only if the resolver returns the same highest-priority CanonicalID(s).

 

This is the Canonical ID Verification Model. It, too, is a valid model defining synonymity and identity. (And the synonymity is verifiable by a resolver. J)

 

Here is a third model:

With respect to my RP, a set of XRI identifiers are synonyms only if my RP as has established an association between the identifiers and the primary key of one of my RP’s “account” records.

 

Note that for this third model, synonymity is irrespective of resolver input parameters. In fact it is really quite irrespective of XRI resolution (although resolution may be required for authentication.) Nonetheless, this is a valid—and will likely be a widely used—model for XRI synonymity.

 

The point is, Markus, that your definition of synonymity is perfectly valid, and so are countless others. With regard to my original point, if we are going to use the term “synonym” in the Resolution specification, we should do so only with respect to a specific model that establishes its meaning.

 

~ Steve

 


From: markus.sabadello@gmail.com [mailto:markus.sabadello@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Markus Sabadello
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:15 AM
To: Steven Churchill
Cc: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [xri] Use of the word "synonym" in section 10

 


I know it's more complicated than that: But from my naive point of view two XRI identifiers are synonyms if for all possible input parameters they return the same SEP(s).

Markus

On 6/8/07, Steven Churchill <steven.churchill@xdi.org> wrote:

Drummond,

 

I don't understand the use of the term "synonym" in section 10.

 

In English, if two words are synonyms, then they have the same (or roughly the same) meaning. In the Identify field, if two identifiers are synonyms, then they refer to the same identity.

 

As I try to express in my text for section 11, these concepts are dependent upon the "model" (or "system") defining the notions of synonymity and identity. In a Banking system, identifiers may include a person's name(s) and account number. In that same model, identity may be defined as "the human being person having a given SSN and DOB". (Don't get confused by the fact that a SSN is also a type of identifier. That is incidental to the model. We are talking here about establishing the definition of identity. Once that is done, then Steven Churchill and Steve Churchill can be synonymous identifiers for the same identity.) In the XRI Canonical ID Verification model, there is a clear notion of synonymity and absolute identity. In any case, the model needs to be formally defined before we can start referring to this thing or that thing as a being a synonym. A synonym to what?

 

Section 10 introduces the term synonym without establishing a model that defines either synonymity or identity. As Gabe and others have correctly pointed out, XRI supports many such models. What are synonyms within one model are not necessarily synonyms within another model.

 

It is not helpful to use the term synonym outside a model defining how two identifiers get mapped to the same identity.

 

~ Steve

 

 




--
@freeXRI / freexri.com / try free i-names



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]