OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xri message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [xri] Minutes:Joint XRI & XDI TC Telecon 10AM PT Thursday 2007-06-21


The feeling is mutual .... and I sincerely hope to continue to work with
you on this or other XRI ventures.

contact: =les
sip: =les/(+phone)
chat: =les/skype/chat
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Churchill [mailto:steven.churchill@xdi.org]
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:11 PM
> To: Chasen, Les; '=drummond.reed'; xri@lists.oasis-open.org;
> xdi@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xri] Minutes:Joint XRI & XDI TC Telecon 10AM PT Thursday
> 2007-06-21
> 
> 
> Les,
> 
> Any decision I have made regarding the TC is not related to you or
that
> debate. That debate served to cover some important points and resulted
in
> net progress. (If anything, I should be apologizing for being somewhat
> snappy near the end.) I have found it both a pleasure and honor to
work
> with
> you.
> 
> ~ Steve
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chasen, Les [mailto:les.chasen@neustar.biz]
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 1:08 AM
> To: =drummond.reed; xri@lists.oasis-open.org; xdi@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xri] Minutes:Joint XRI & XDI TC Telecon 10AM PT Thursday
> 2007-06-21
> 
> Steve -
> 
> Let me apologize for our synonym debate ... I was saying that Ref's
> should not be synonyms as they just declare a relationship of some
sort
> and one cannot determine if the two authorities are the same entity.
I
> was wrong, refs have been defined as synonymous for quite some time
> meaning that they *cannot* be used to just establish relationships.
> 
> Sorry
> 
> Les
> 
> 
> contact: =les
> sip: =les/(+phone)
> chat: =les/skype/chat
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: =drummond.reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net]
> > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:19 AM
> > To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org; xdi@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [xri] Minutes:Joint XRI & XDI TC Telecon 10AM PT Thursday
> 2007-
> > 06-21
> >
> > Following are the minutes of a joint unofficial telecon of the XRI
and
> XDI
> > TCs at:
> >
> > Date:  Thursday, 21 June 2007 USA
> > Time:  10:00AM - 12:00PM Pacific Time
> >
> > Event Description:
> > Weekly unofficial joint call of the XRI and XDI Technical
Committees.
> >
> > ATTENDING
> >
> > Gabe Wachob
> > Les Chasen
> > Markus Sabadello
> > Drummond Reed
> > Wil Tan
> >
> >
> > AGENDA
> >
> > 1) UPDATE TO XRD SCHEMA FOR XRI RESOLUTION 2.0 WORKING DRAFT 11
> >
> > Gabe reported that he and Bill have not yet make progress on the
> revisions
> > to the XRD schema, but Gabe will try to do so by the end of the
week.
> >
> > # GABE and BILL to complete revisions to the schema & send to
> Drummond.
> >
> >
> > 2) EXTENDING CANONICAL ID VERIFICATION TO HTTP(S) URIS
> >
> > Two special telecons held on this topic over the last week. A slight
> > update
> > has been posted to the XRI TC wiki:
> >
> > 	http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriCd02/CanonicalIdVerification
> >
> > This proposal is now referenced by the OpenID editors in the
following
> > writeup of the OpenID recycling issue on the OpenID wiki:
> >
> > 	http://openid.net/wiki/index.php/Identifier_Recycling
> >
> > * We discussed the main tenants of the proposal, including the
> definition
> > of
> > synonym in section 3.2.3 of XRI Resolution 2.0 Working Draft 11
ED02.
> >
> > * It was apparent there were differing understandings of the
function
> of
> > Ref
> > elements. It was agreed that the spec should carry an explicit
warning
> > that
> > Refs MUST be used only to represent synonyms for the resolved
> identifier
> > assigned by an authority other than the authority producing the
> current
> > XRD,
> > and MUST NOT be used to express any other form of relationship
between
> the
> > authorities.
> >
> > * As the security implications of the extended Canonical ID
> verification
> > proposal were reviewed, it as agreed that the spec should also
include
> > warnings that:
> >
> > 	a) As with DNS or any other registry-based identifier
> > infrastructure, Canonical ID verification depends on trusting each
> > authority
> > in the resolution chain.
> >
> > 	b) Any Canonical ID assigned by an XRI registry under its own
> > authority SHOULD not be editable by a registrant.
> >
> > 	c) Trusting a Canonical ID without verification can enable
> spoofing
> > of Canonical IDs.
> >
> > The following action items were assigned:
> >
> > # GABE and MARKUS to both take a close look at the extended
Canonical
> ID
> > verification writeup and post any comments.
> >
> > # DRUMMOND to draft revised text for section 11 once this feedback
is
> > received.
> >
> >
> > 3) PROGRESS REPORT FOR XRI RESOLUTION 2.O WORKING DRAFT 11
> >
> > The current draft, ED02, is at:
> >
> >
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/24286/xri-resolution-
> > v2.0-
> > wd-11-ed-02.doc
> >
> > Drummond said he plans to post ED03, containing as many action items
> as he
> > can finish, before he leaves for the Burton Catalyst conference on
> Monday.
> >
> >
> > 4) NEXT CALL
> >
> > Due to Catalyst travel, we will not hold a telecon next week, but
will
> > resume our call schedule on Thursday, July 5.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]