[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Special XRI TC Telecon 1PM PT Thursday 2007-10-01
Sorry, we were a little late. The conference is going now. Please try again. =Drummond > -----Original Message----- > From: John Bradley [mailto:jbradley@mac.com] > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 1:05 PM > To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: Kermit Snelson; Andy Dale > Subject: Re: [xri] Special XRI TC Telecon 1PM PT Thursday 2007-10-01 > > I cant get in. > > On Oct 1, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Gabe Wachob wrote: > > > Says there's no conference scheduled at this time? > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net] > >> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:06 AM > >> To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org > >> Cc: 'John Bradley'; 'Kermit Snelson'; andy.dale@ootao.com > >> Subject: [xri] Special XRI TC Telecon 1PM PT Thursday 2007-10-01 > >> > >> Following is the agenda for a SPECIAL unofficial telecon of the > >> XRI TC at: > >> > >> Date: Monday, 01 October 2007 USA > >> Time: 1:00PM - 2:30PM Pacific Time > >> > >> Event Description: > >> Special telecon to discuss XRI resolution reference processing as > >> described > >> below. > >> > >> TO ACCESS THE AUDIO CONFERENCE: > >> Dial In Number: 571-434-5750 > >> Conference ID: 5474 > >> > >> > >> AGENDA > >> > >> 1) REVISED REF PROCESSING PROPOSAL > >> At last Thursday's XRI/XDI TC telecon we had extensive discussion > >> of Ref > >> processing. We were not able to close on the telecon, however > >> subsequent > >> discussion has produced an updated proposal posted tonight > >> (Sunday) at: > >> > >> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriCd02/RefProcessing > >> > >> The three key changes in this new proposal (vs. the one discussed > >> on the > >> TC > >> call last Thursday) are: > >> > >> a) Addition of a Redirect element to take over the function of > >> what was > >> previously a "service ref" (which Steve points out operated > >> differently > >> than > >> an "authority ref"). > >> > >> b) Keeping the refs= parameter as a boolean (as it was in ED05). > >> > >> c) Elimination of the proposed "find all" option -- too complex to be > >> introduced at this stage (and can be performed by a separate > >> utility if > >> needed). > >> > >> PLEASE REVIEW THIS UPDATED PROPOSAL BEFORE THE CALL IF YOU HAVE > >> TIME -- it > >> is of paramount importance that we close on ref processing so we can > >> complete ED06 and proceed to a Committee Draft vote. > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]