RE: [xri] Special XRI TC Telecon 1PM PT Thursday 2007-10-01

["Drummond Reed" <drummond.reed@cordance.net>]

Sorry, we were a little late. The conference is going now. Please try again.

=Drummond 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Bradley [mailto:jbradley@mac.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 1:05 PM
> To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: Kermit Snelson; Andy Dale
> Subject: Re: [xri] Special XRI TC Telecon 1PM PT Thursday 2007-10-01
> 
> I cant get in.
> 
> On Oct 1, 2007, at 1:02 PM, Gabe Wachob wrote:
> 
> > Says there's no conference scheduled at this time?
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net]
> >> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:06 AM
> >> To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> >> Cc: 'John Bradley'; 'Kermit Snelson'; andy.dale@ootao.com
> >> Subject: [xri] Special XRI TC Telecon 1PM PT Thursday 2007-10-01
> >>
> >> Following is the agenda for a SPECIAL unofficial telecon of the
> >> XRI TC at:
> >>
> >> Date:  Monday, 01 October 2007 USA
> >> Time:  1:00PM - 2:30PM Pacific Time
> >>
> >> Event Description:
> >> Special telecon to discuss XRI resolution reference processing as
> >> described
> >> below.
> >>
> >> TO ACCESS THE AUDIO CONFERENCE:
> >>     Dial In Number: 571-434-5750
> >>     Conference ID: 5474
> >>
> >>
> >> AGENDA
> >>
> >> 1) REVISED REF PROCESSING PROPOSAL
> >> At last Thursday's XRI/XDI TC telecon we had extensive discussion
> >> of Ref
> >> processing. We were not able to close on the telecon, however
> >> subsequent
> >> discussion has produced an updated proposal posted tonight
> >> (Sunday) at:
> >>
> >> 	http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriCd02/RefProcessing
> >>
> >> The three key changes in this new proposal (vs. the one discussed
> >> on the
> >> TC
> >> call last Thursday) are:
> >>
> >> a) Addition of a Redirect element to take over the function of
> >> what was
> >> previously a "service ref" (which Steve points out operated
> >> differently
> >> than
> >> an "authority ref").
> >>
> >> b) Keeping the refs= parameter as a boolean (as it was in ED05).
> >>
> >> c) Elimination of the proposed "find all" option -- too complex to be
> >> introduced at this stage (and can be performed by a separate
> >> utility if
> >> needed).
> >>
> >> PLEASE REVIEW THIS UPDATED PROPOSAL BEFORE THE CALL IF YOU HAVE
> >> TIME -- it
> >> is of paramount importance that we close on ref processing so we can
> >> complete ED06 and proceed to a Committee Draft vote.
> >
> >