Re: [xri] trusted discovery workflow

[Brian Eaton <beaton@google.com>]

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com> wrote:
> I'm wondering whether it would make more sense to make the opposite
> assumption (that the key will be available _after_ the reference has been
> dereferenced). Seems like a strictly more general way to go (if I know the
> key beforehand, I'll know it afterwards, but not the other way 'round), and
> allows us to keep our options more open with respect to what those unnamed
> key-trust-mechanisms are.

Yeah, makes sense, updated the algorithm in the wiki.