Re: [xri] XRD trusted discovery workflow

[Brian Eaton <beaton@google.com>]

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com> wrote:
> - Having the URIMap element inside a Service element that also specifies a
> service type seems weird to me. It does have the advantage of being able to
> specify different resource maps for different service types, but somehow I
> always thought that there would be just one resource map (for XRD) for a
> site (perhaps from the days when I thought this would be in site-meta?). So
> I kinda expected something like <URIMap> as a direct child of the <XRD>
> element. I wonder what other people think about that.

I think it's important to keep URIMap per-service.  For example,
imagine I want to delegate per-url service foo to one service
provider, and per-url service bar to another service provider.
Wouldn't I need a separate URIMap for each service type?