[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Re: content negotiation for site-meta
/site-meta itself it going to define a single format. Anything
else will have to define its own extension so imposing a .txt on the generic
version makes little sense. The real question is if there is value in an XRD
version, considering the data might not perfectly overlap. EHL From: sappenin@gmail.com
[mailto:sappenin@gmail.com] On Behalf Of David Fuelling Full overlap aside, couldn't
you just specify that the textual version can be found at /site-meta (or
/site-meta.txt), and the XRD version can be found at /site-meta.xrd? On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote: I
agree with your analysis. What makes me reconsider this is the lack of full
overlap between /site-meta (text) and XRD. In my previous email you can see
where I had to add another namespace to support <site-meta:scheme>. Since
the text format will be required in any compliant implementation, maybe we
should not support an XRD flavor of /site-meta.
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]