Re: No canonicalization?

[Brian Eaton <beaton@google.com>]

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 7:19 PM, Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp> wrote:
> It just occured to me.
>
> Although we are talking about "binary signing" and "no canonicalization",
> there seems to be some chances that httpd would transform \n to \r\n
> depending on the server configuration.
>
> So do we want to standerdize on \r\n as the end-of-line?
> (Well, it is a bit of canonicalizaton then...)

We don't need it.  HTTP servers can and do transfer raw byte streams
without messing with them.