RE: [xri] OASIS spec template

["Drummond Reed" <drummond.reed@cordance.net>]

Wil,

I just updated that page to reflect Mary McRae's (our TC administrator)
feedback about spec filenames (all those listed on the page are now
correct).

However, on the question of what OASIS template is preferred, you're correct
that no decision has been made yet for XRD 1.0. (The decision was made for
XRI 3.0 spec and the XRI 3.0 Binding specs -- which is to use MS Word for
legacy reasons.) 

But for the XRI 1.0 spec, it is editor's choice. So you and Eran (and any
other editors) should discuss it and choose whichever of the OASIS templates
you feel will work best for you.

Note Mary's advice on that page, though: DO start fresh with a new current
OASIS template, whichever one you choose, and don't try to adapt an existing
document.

Feel free to post questions here as you go - I too am working on XRI 3.0
spec editing this week.

=Drummond 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Norris [mailto:Will@willnorris.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 1:47 PM
> To: XRI TC
> Subject: [xri] OASIS spec template
> 
> judging by this page[0], no decision was made as to what OASIS
> template is preferred to be authoritative for XRI.  Can we go ahead
> and decide on that?  I don't have very strong feelings one way or the
> other toward any of them.  I do like the idea of using a non-binary
> format, so that we can make use of traditional version control
> systems, but can go with whatever.
> 
> -will
> 
> [0]: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/InfoForEditors
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php