XRD feedback from Scott

[Will Norris <will@willnorris.com>]

Other feedback from Scott, for what it's worth....

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
> Date: May 27, 2009 8:55:49 AM PDT
> To: <shibboleth-core@internet2.edu>
> Subject: RE: [shibboleth-core] XRD working draft
> Reply-To: shibboleth-core@internet2.edu
>
> Sec 2.2.2:
>
> Suggest use of UTC be made a MUST rather than a SHOULD. If I have to  
> support
> non-UTC anyway, the SHOULD is meaningless and it probably shouldn't  
> say
> anything to ensure proper support for non-UTC.
>
> Uses the term "Discovery Document". Does this mean the XRD instance?  
> I would
> just use that term rather than adding a new one.
>
> Suggest it NOT try to compose with HTTP (e.g. the Expires header)  
> for ease
> of implementation and full agnosticism of the transport. Otherwise,  
> I would
> suggest not allowing for that overlap at all and require that only the
> transport dictate expiration, or that they have to match and  
> implementations
> can rely on either one.