[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Very rough algorithm outline
Nat Sakimura wrote on 2009-06-17: > But then, would it not mean that we start copy & pasting the spec? No, it means you might have to add a non-normative part that explains why the reference to the full spec doesn't mean you have to implement it. All of the implementations out there know how to optimize for subtrees, and they do so, but only with a lot of extra logic welded on to the complex parts. If you don't care about the complex parts, the optimization is all that's left. The spec is still the spec. The trick is in understanding how to spot where it's assuming generality that doesn't apply. With respect to excl c14n, that subsection I keep pointing to is basically the optimized algorithm. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]