Re: [xri] URI Fragment in <Subject> or <Alias>

[Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>]

Hi.

John has already replied, but we absolutely need URI Frangment
for OpenID use cases.

Regards,

=nat

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 6:34 AM
To: "'Eran Hammer-Lahav'" <eran@hueniverse.com>; "'XRI TC'" 
<xri@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: RE: [xri] URI Fragment in <Subject> or <Alias>

> Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote on 2009-06-26:
>> I am not sure we need to say anything about it, but I can't figure out
> what
>> it means if an XRD has a subject with a fragment as part of the URI.
>
> I don't think it means anything, in the context of a URI as an abstract
> identifier for something that may or may not resolve. They're best avoided
> simply because they create confusion, but don't really hurt anything 
> either.
>
> The only meaning they can have would be relative to resolution for
> particular MIME types that define the meaning, and I don't think that
> applies to an identifier.
>
> -- Scott
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>