RE: [xri] thoughts on linked XRD rel value

[Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Norris [mailto:will@willnorris.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 10:20 AM
> To: XRI TC
> Subject: Re: [xri] thoughts on linked XRD rel value
> 
> 
> On Jul 28, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> 
> > In the processing instructions, the parser will look for those (at
> > the appropriate time) and ignore any MediaType or other Rels. It
> > will attempt to fetch the documents pointed to by the <URI> (in
> > priority order) and only use them if they are valid XRD 1.0
> documents.
> 
> so that means you can't use URITemplate for linked XRDs?  Even if
> another rel value on the link defines a template vocabulary?

Yes. That other rel value should define an extension parsing behavior.
 
> 
> > It is worth checking if there is a similar registered link relation
> > (from atom or html) and point out that they are not the same in the
> > spec to avoid confusion.
> 
> check.

Checked. There is nothing.

EHL