[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Version Control Commit by blade
> There is: http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/ > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-06#section-4.1 I'm ok with that. I haven't seen it done, but it seems reasonable to say "MUST either be an absolute URI or a relative URI with respect to the base URI "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/". I just want a consistent semantic if it's going to be expressed as a URI. I don't *agree* particularly with using short names like this, it's a false optimization that people just need to get over, but as long as it's unambiguous, seems ok. From reading that draft, it says, as I think Eran said, that using the full URI with those relation types is a SHOULD NOT, so we obviously shouldn't do it. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]