[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xri] talking about types
Will Norris wrote: >> There are a number of places where the text talks about the value type >> of a particular element. For example: >> >>> <Subject> is a xs:anyURI value which identifies a resource. That was an example of the text I referred to on the call as needing some clean up work. >> Do folks think that the above sentence should be updated to reflect >> this, or am I just splitting hairs? If it should be changed, should >> it be changed to declare a type of xrd:anyURI? Or rather should it >> stick with xs:anyURI and just be more specific that the **value** of >> the element has that type? > > Just thinking that one way to reword the above sentence would be to > replace "is" with "contains": Personally, I think it's simpler to be more vague about it and just say "contains a URI value which...". The schema snippet should be right there to refer to for the precise definition. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]