Re: [xri] Version Control Commit by willnorris

[Will Norris <will@willnorris.com>]

On Sep 8, 2009, at 1:11 PM, workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org wrote:
> Log:
> revert to previous extension model.  Remove DSig elements from XRD  
> schema to address problem with ambiguous content model (simply allow  
> DSig elements to be extended elements)


for those who don't like reading DocBook XML, the main textual change  
in this commit is that Section 2.1 has been updated to say the  
following for ds:Signature:

> This is an XML Signature, included from the [XML Signature] schema,  
> that protects the integrity of the document, as described in Section  
> 5, “XRD Signature”.
>
> Although XML Signature allows a single document to contain multiple  
> signatures, the signing profile described in Section 5, “XRD  
> Signature” requires only a single<Signature> element. Use of  
> multiple <Signature> elements in an XRD document is therefore  
> undefined. In order to aid certain types of XRD consumers, it is  
> RECOMMENDED that XRD providers place the <Signature> element of a  
> signed XRD as near the beginning of the document as possible.

Otherwise, most of the changes are to the schema itself and the Schema  
Extensions text.

-will