xri message

Subject: RE: [xri] RE: #next: alternate to #replace

From: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: "'Breno de Medeiros'" <breno@google.com>, "'Eran Hammer-Lahav'" <eran@hueniverse.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:27:08 -0400

Breno de Medeiros wrote on 2009-09-18:
> So parsimony and conservatism in embracing changes at this late
> juncture would probably both say: Abandon the concept of linked XRDs
> altogether for XRD 2.0

+1 (and I'll stop responding on this thread, sorry for jumping in late)

-- Scott

References:
- Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-09-17
  - From: "Drummond Reed" <drummond.reed@cordance.net>
- #next: alternate to #replace
  - From: "Drummond Reed" <drummond.reed@cordance.net>
- RE: #next: alternate to #replace
  - From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
- Re: [xri] RE: #next: alternate to #replace
  - From: Breno de Medeiros <breno@google.com>
- RE: [xri] RE: #next: alternate to #replace
  - From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
- Re: [xri] RE: #next: alternate to #replace
  - From: Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com>
- Re: [xri] RE: #next: alternate to #replace
  - From: Dirk Balfanz <balfanz@google.com>
- RE: [xri] RE: #next: alternate to #replace
  - From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
- RE: [xri] RE: #next: alternate to #replace
  - From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
- Re: [xri] RE: #next: alternate to #replace
  - From: Breno de Medeiros <breno@google.com>