[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Some questions: URITemplate
Breno de Medeiros wrote on 2009-09-22: > For a moment taking the leap that URITemplate gets moved out of the XRD > spec. > > Should in this case <Link> call for '1 or More' URI's? Right now, it > calls for '0 or More', but without either a URI or URITemplate it is > not clear what purpose a <Link> element might serve. Presumably it's 0 or more because it could be either? It's problematic to make it mandatory to have a URI if you want the possibility of a template as an extension, right? If this was removed from the XRD document, what would the resulting host-meta (or whatever) extension be to add it back? If it ends up just looking the same, and there are other potential use cases, why not include a generic element with a straw-man expression syntax and just allow for replacing it with others once they're standardized? -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]