RE: [xri] Property, rel comparison

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote on 2010-01-26:
> I think saying that the <Subject> URI identifies a resource per 3986 is
> enough. That implies all the necessary processing and comparison rules.
But
> I am happy to use another language. The point I was trying to make on the
> Subject URI was that it was *not* a string comparison but a URI
comparison.
> I guess that just means scheme-specific URI comparison.

Even if 3896 isn't purely concrete about it, if we're not prepared to say
more than it says, I would say we should reference it and leave it at that
for <Subject>.

But if we wanted to allow specifically for a totally application-specific
set of rules for this, we really would be better off just saying *that*.

-- Scott