[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: XRI TC call today (Thursday)?
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 08:31, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote:Great! Ship it :)
> I'm saying that 'the Subject identified the resource' is all we should say. But that we should also say that for the purpose of comparing the subject URI to other URIs, scheme-specific rules must be used.
>
> EHL
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Breno de Medeiros [mailto:breno@google.com]
>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 8:30 AM
>> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
>> Cc: Scott Cantor; xri@lists.oasis-open.org
>> Subject: Re: [xri] What is this XRD is for?
>>
>> Forgetting the whole thing about Alias for a while, you are saying that we
>> don't have to describe how the Subject refers to the resource?
>> (e.g., applications should normalize the Subject in a scheme-dependent
>> fashion)? Of course applications are free to define further equivalence
>> conditions.
>>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]