[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: XRI TC call today (Thursday)?
I vote for skipping too. I will be working with Will today on implementing the changes we discussed last meeting on the XRI X.509 Trust profile and we hope to post a revised draft soon, in time for discussion next week. On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:58, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote: > We can skip it today. > > > > EHL > > > > From: drummond.reed@gmail.com [mailto:drummond.reed@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Drummond Reed > Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 4:12 AM > To: Breno de Medeiros > Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; Scott Cantor; xri@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: XRI TC call today (Thursday)? > > > > I haven't seen anything about a WD 14 draft being posted yet or any other > traffice since 2/5. Should we hold a call tomorrow? I might have a conflict > myself - I don't know yet - but unless we have a new WD ready, perhaps > better to let Will and Eran use the time to post one. > > So right now I'll assume no call unless Will or Eran or Breno or someone > thinks we need it. Please post if you do. > > =Drummond > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Breno de Medeiros <breno@google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 08:31, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote: >> I'm saying that 'the Subject identified the resource' is all we should >> say. But that we should also say that for the purpose of comparing the >> subject URI to other URIs, scheme-specific rules must be used. > > Great! Ship it :) > >> >> EHL >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Breno de Medeiros [mailto:breno@google.com] >>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 8:30 AM >>> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav >>> Cc: Scott Cantor; xri@lists.oasis-open.org >>> Subject: Re: [xri] What is this XRD is for? >>> >>> Forgetting the whole thing about Alias for a while, you are saying that >>> we >>> don't have to describe how the Subject refers to the resource? >>> (e.g., applications should normalize the Subject in a scheme-dependent >>> fashion)? Of course applications are free to define further equivalence >>> conditions. >>> > > -- --Breno +1 (650) 214-1007 desk +1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central) MTV-41-3 : 383-A PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]