RE: [xri] Comparison Rules

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

Will Norris wrote on 2010-02-18:
> I was mainly looking for any feedback regarding the question:
> 
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Will Norris <willnorris@google.com>
wrote:
> 
> 
> 	Should we be referencing 2616 instead of 2046, for the initial
> definition of 'type' in XRD?  That might actually make a lot of sense,
since
> 2046 doesn't actually define the syntax of a media type... that's in 2045
> (as well as 2616, of course).

Maybe both are needed.

-- Scott