RE: XRD 1.0 next steps

[Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>]

What's the format of an implementation statement? I'll post one for Yahoo!. It would be great to get more so we can be done with that part.

EHL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eran Hammer-Lahav [mailto:eran@hueniverse.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 10:34 PM
> To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [xri] XRD 1.0 next steps
> 
> Public review ends next week and assuming no last minute surprise, the
> comments received will not require any normative language change. I am
> following up with the IESG to find out where the Link draft stands but from
> the comments, the focus is on technical registry details, not the header or
> link framework semantics (which is what we referenced).
> 
> I will make the change to the file extension registration.
> 
> Will - can you fix the example per James' note?
> 
> Drummond - can you find out what's OASIS policy with regard to a normative
> dependency on a-not-yet-published RFC? Is IESG approval enough (IETF
> rules allow referencing an IESG approved draft before RFC publication)? And
> based on that answer, when can we submit this for a standard vote?
> 
> EHL
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php