[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xri] FW: New Version Notification - draft-hammer-hostmeta-09.txt
-1 to this change. Can you explain why the simplification is worth the cost of making a last-minute change and sowing uncertainty at this last stage? On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:49, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote: > They can do whatever they want, as long as it is valid according to the XRD schema. Host-meta leaves <Subject> and <Alias> undefined and not recommended. > > EHL > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Breno de Medeiros [mailto:breno@google.com] >> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 10:21 AM >> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav >> Cc: xri@lists.oasis-open.org; webfinger@googlegroups.com >> Subject: Re: [xri] FW: New Version Notification - draft-hammer-hostmeta- >> 09.txt >> >> I suspect people will want to write a <Subject> instead of <hm:Host> now >> that it's gone. :) >> >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 00:52, Eran Hammer-Lahav >> <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote: >> > After much (re)deliberation and discussions, I've decided to drop the >> <Host> element from host-meta. The two reasons why it was there were: >> > >> > 1. make host-meta self-contained so it can be obtained via other means >> > than /.well-known/host-meta 2. provide a subject for signatures >> > >> > Since there are no use cases for #1, and #2 has failed to materialize after >> more than a year of discussions (still no signature profile published), I have >> decided that for the sake of simplicity and practicality to remove the >> element. host-meta doesn't address security and it should not provide a >> hook for future security profiles - that's their job. Those who find a need for >> expressing the subject of a host-meta XRD (or JRD) can add it back in their >> own spec (or make up something else). >> > >> > -09 dropped the element. >> > >> > Note that there is going to be a -10 coming out shortly which merges LRDD >> back into host-meta, dropping links from HTTP headers and HTML bodies >> (which don't have any driving use cases). >> > >> > EHL >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Internet-Draft@ietf.org [mailto:Internet-Draft@ietf.org] >> > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 12:45 AM >> > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; draft-hammer-hostmeta@tools.ietf.org; >> > stpeter@stpeter.im >> > Subject: New Version Notification - draft-hammer-hostmeta-09.txt >> > >> > New version (-09) has been submitted for draft-hammer-hostmeta-09.txt. >> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hammer-hostmeta-09.txt >> > >> > >> > Diff from previous version: >> > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-hammer-hostmeta-09 >> > >> > IETF Secretariat. >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> --Breno >> >> +1 (650) 214-1007 desk >> +1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central) >> MTV-41-3 : 383-A >> PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7) > -- --Breno +1 (650) 214-1007 desk +1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central) MTV-41-3 : 383-A PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]