[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Correction Re: Registration of media/mime type application/xrd+xml
Correction: the subject of the message in the XRI TC comment list is "'xri' URI scheme not yet registered" The updated information in the post below WRT the media/mime type application/xrd+xml is accurate and on topic, I think. ;-) - RCC Robin Cover OASIS, Director of Information Services Editor, Cover Pages and XML Daily Newslink Email: robin@oasis-open.org Staff bio: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/staff.php#cover Cover Pages: http://xml.coverpages.org/ Newsletter: http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletterArchive.html Tel: +1 972-296-1783 On Fri, 27 May 2011, Robin Cover wrote: > XRI TC members, > > A posting to the XRI TC's comment list [1] mentions > again the matter of application/xrd+xml with IESG/IETF. > > Per recent notices in the TC's main list archive [2], > I have taken initial steps to make a registration > request per the online forms and RCF 4288 [3], and > have copied Drummond Reed on the correspondence. > > I will coordinate further with Drummond to make a > more detailed report back to the TC on the status > of the request. > > - Robin Cover, TC Administration > > ========= References: > > [1] TC comment list posting > > http://markmail.org/message/aad5pr3dy5oqgsx2?q=oasis+xri-comment > > Message-ID: <4DDFA429.8090000@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 16:16:25 +0300 > From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> > To: xri-comment@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [xri-comment] 'xri' URI scheme not yet registered > > Hi all, > > Reading the XRI TC specification and seeing the IANA > registry for URI schemes > (http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html), > I've noticed that the 'xri' URI scheme, used when > mapping XRIs to URIs/IRIs, isn't yet registered there. > Since there is a claimed use of this scheme name, > I think it is necessary to officially register the > scheme with IETF/IANA. This might be done via > publishing the Informational RFC. So what's your > opinion? If you think it is a good idea, I may help > as an editor of an appropriate document. > > Mykyta Yevstifeyev > > > [2] recent activity for Registration of application/xrd+xml with IETF > > Re: [xri] Re: Registration of application/xrd+xml with IETF > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xri/201105/msg00002.html > > Re: Registration of application/xrd+xml with IETF > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xri/201105/msg00001.html > > Earlier: > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xri/201104/msg00000.html > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xri/201104/msg00001.html > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xri/201104/msg00002.html > > > [3] Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4288#section-3.1 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4288#section-5.1 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4288#section-4.10 > > -- > > Robin Cover > OASIS, Director of Information Services > Editor, Cover Pages and XML Daily Newslink > Email: robin@oasis-open.org > Staff bio: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/staff.php#cover > Cover Pages: http://xml.coverpages.org/ > Newsletter: http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletterArchive.html > Tel: +1 972-296-1783 > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]