[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Canonical XML went to CR on 26 October
David_Marston@lotus.com wrote: > > The W3C's spec for Canonical XML has now moved forward to > Candidate Recommendation status. See > http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xml-c14n-20001026 > for the spec itself. This phase ends 24 November unless > surprises occur. > > The relevance to our project is that we can plan on the > existence of a standard and probably some tools that will > neutralize "unimportant" differences in XML files. This will > allow delivery of "correct output" files for each test case > that produces XML output that will be able to be compared > with actual output from any given processor. Actually, I > wouldn't be surprised if generate-id() results will need > human scanning, but most differences can be neutralized. > .................David Marston Last time I took a look at the C14N proposal (admittedly, some months ago), comments (that is, <!-- -->) were gobbled up and never output. If that is still true, how can you use it on the output and still get any kind of testing for xsl:comment ? (I know I should take a look at the C14N proposal before sending this message, but w3.org seems to be down; my apologies if this is a waste of bandwidth). -- Eduardo Gutentag | e-mail: eduardo@eng.Sun.COM XML Technology Center | Phone: (650) 786-5498 Sun Microsystems Inc. | fax: (650) 786-5727
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC