Re: Status of web site changes

[Carmelo Montanez <carmelo@nist.gov>]

Hi All:

    Am I missing something.  I posted some changes to the web site and the
page
completely changed in format.  Is there a new version of the ".css" file
which
somehow changed?  I posted a changed sometime ago and I was never reflected.
I made the change to the "index.html" file not realizing that the filename
apparently
should be "index.shtml"

Carmelo

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carmelo Montanez" <carmelo@nist.gov>
To: "John Robert Gardner" <John.Robert.Gardner@east.sun.com>;
<xslt-conformance@lists.oasis-open.org>; <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: Status of web site changes


> Hi all:
>
>     Pending any comments tonight I will have those changes reflected in
the
> morning.
>
> Carmelo
> ]
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Robert Gardner" <John.Robert.Gardner@east.sun.com>
> To: <xslt-conformance@lists.oasis-open.org>;
<gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 2:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Status of web site changes
>
>
> > Apologies for the delay,  changes are annotated below with <changed>
tags
> to
> > reflect the discussion/passed measure from the October meeting:
> >
> > Resolved:
> >
> > It shall be the policy of the OASIS XSLT Conformance committee that,
> > when there should arise any dispute among members or from formal
> submission by
> > observers as to the interpretation of the W3C Recommendation for XSLT
> and/or
> > XPath that said disputes be placed before the committee for a vote as to
> whether
> > to forward the question to the W3C for a formal resolution of the
> perceived
> > ambiguity.  The vote can be moved by any voting member present.  Such
vote
> would
> > be by 2/3 majority of quorum.  Failure to achieve 2/3 majority vote
> reverts the
> > issue back to discussion and motion for one position or another to be
> adopted as
> > the XSLT Conformance Committee's <changed>concurrence with the
> W3C</changed>.
> >
> > The member motioning for the W3C submission will have responsibility to
> > word the submission, submitted to the committee email list for general
> > discussion, and the final version of the submitted question(s) will be
> sent by
> > the committee chair <changed>or their designee</changed> on behalf of
the
> > committee.  Disputations from each voting
> > meeting, by phone, or in-person meeting, shall be submitted as a group.
> >
> > For timeliness on responses, and hopeful resolution at the meeting
> > succeeding that in which the question was voted for submission, the
draft
> of
> > submitted question shall be required for posting to the Committee listno
> later
> > than 10 working days after the meeting which the disputation arose.
> >
> > --------------
> >
> > How will a call-in for this meeting be possible?
> >
> > Best wishes
> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-|
> > John Robert Gardner
> > Enterprise Management Architecture Group
> > Sun Microsystems Inc.,
> > MailStop UBUR02-306
> > 1 Network Drive
> > Burlington, MA  01803-0903 |  "Failure is not an option"
> > |
> > Ph. 781-442-0692 |  Eugene Crantz
> > Fax 781-442-1539 |  NASA
> > e-mail  john.robert.gardner@sun.com
> > -----------------------------------
> > http://vedavid.org/diss/
> > http://vedavid.org/xml/docs/
> >
> >
>
>