[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xslt-conformance] Reviewing (from: Minutes for March Teleconference...)
David Marston/Cambridge/IBM wrote: >>...- Complete Test Suite >>... * Test Validation >> The consensus at the meeting was that we don't have the resources >> to validate >> the tests, and that we will have to include them all "as is". > > > We seem to be oscillating on this point. At the face-to-face in > Cambridge, my sense was that we agreed that the reviews are the real > added value from this process. The world expects that this suite has > been screened. What would the XSL WG be willing to say about this > collection if it's not reviewed? Would the WG be willing to let us do > the same for XSLT/XPath 2.0? Remember that QAWG and the W3C in general > are pushing toward having a WG-sanctioned suite for every Rec for > which conformance can be measured. > > My suggestion: at the next meeting at which we have a quorum and have > at least one WG member present (Zarella, or Bob L. if he joins the TC) > we draw up a pros-and-cons comparison. > .................David Marston > I agree -- it needs to be discussed. A quick summary of yesterday's meeting: there are over 3000 tests -- we will never get them all validated. I'd be happy to be convinced otherwise. -- -------------------------- Jeff Kenton DataPower Technology, Inc.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]