[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of the June 26, 2009 XSPA conference call
|
Minutes of the June 26, 2009 XSPA Conference Call Friday, June 26, 2009, 1:00pm ET Dial in info: +1 800 767 1750 Access code 97728 [i.e. XSPA T(C)] 1. Roll Call & Agenda Review Voting Members: Steven Meyer, HIPAAT International, Inc. Richard Franck, IBM Clifford Thompson, Individual Daniel Dority, Jericho Systems Corporation Mike Davis, Veterans Health Administration David Staggs, Veterans Health Administration Quorum attained. 2. Minutes of June 19, 2009 were approved. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xspa/email/archives/200906/msg00020.html 3. Background on HL7 work on mapping ASTM and SNOMED structural roles
was shared: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xspa/email/archives/200906/msg00018.html 4&5. Discussion on comments from the Privacy Sub-team of the NHIN
Specifications Factory. Richard Franck discussed his understanding of the XSPA message flow between
PDP, PEP, and PIP under the topic “intended conformance points.”
Duane agreed and clarified the profile deals with attributes which can be used
in many ways. The term “dissenting” was discussed and their intended
use with obligations. Distinction was made between passing directives
through obligations and policies derived from the PIP. Richard proposed
profile takes us “80% there” and suggested additional work by the
committee would be of great value to healthcare exchanges. The TC agreed
to continue developing the ideas that could be proposed for version 2 on the
list and in the TC meetings. 4a. Proposal to close comment 3: “Does the “hl7” in
this attribute name really belong?” CLOSED 4b. Proposal to close comment 6 & 7 “Add an attribute
“Rule Start Date” and “Rule End Date” to the XSPA XACML
profile.” CLOSED (After the discussion above Richard was leaning toward postponing
this request until version 2.) 5a. Nature of the XSPA profile of XACML and “intended conformance
points.” Discussed
and in general agreement. 5b. Specific points about attribute names and item 11 (comment 8c) on
the spreadsheet: Mike Davis suggested an enumeration of the ASTM roles that would include
the SNOMED codes. Mike and David will be meeting with ASTM to set up a
ballot and will share the proposed changes with Richard for his comments. 5c. Correction of namespace for subject-id i.e.
urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:subject:subject-id:” David will look into the possibility of changing the XACML committee
specification but it may be too late. Use of xacml:2.0 did not cause a
problem in the HIMSS demonstration but made have reflected the software used. 6. Open discussion 7. Issue list David will circulate the spreadsheet with proposed updates.
Richard will review and propose additions/changes. Regards, David David Staggs, JD, CISSP
(SAIC) |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]